What is enough actually for?
Lagom was never about mediocrity. It was about enough for the group. A draft is not yet a decision — two human questions remain: what needs to happen, and are we willing to stand behind it?
Here is the part that matters most, and it is easy to skip.
Here is the part that matters most, and it is easy to skip.
Lagom was never about being mediocre. It was about enough, measured against what the group needs. A society that treats enough as a real amount can build things that serve most people well, without promising anyone everything.
The danger now is that we are importing the Swedish products without the Swedish question. We get the good-enough tools. We skip the harder part: agreeing what they should be good enough for.
Without that question, lagom turns into its hollow version. A flat sameness that serves whoever sets the defaults, not the people it was meant to help.
Two questions: what needs to happen here, and are we willing to stand behind.
Here is the part that matters most, and it is easy to skip.
It was about enough, measured against what the group needs.
A society that treats enough as a real amount can build things that serve most people well, without promising anyone everything.
This is where the responsibility of designers, strategists, and product people becomes clear. The Swedish companies that lasted did so because someone made hard choices under the pleasant surface. What to leave out. What to refuse. What to stand behind. IKEA's catalogue is edited. Spotify made a bold bet when the industry disagreed.
The same will be true in the AI era. A drafted document, a generated website, a synthesised strategy is not yet a decision. It is a starting point.
Two questions still need a human answer. What needs to happen here? And are we willing to stand behind it? Everything between those two questions can now be made by the machine. The questions themselves cannot.
It was about enough, measured against what the group needs.
Two questions: what needs to happen here, and are we willing to stand behind it.
Lagom was never about mediocrity. It was about enough for the group. A draft is not yet a decision — two human questions remain: what needs to happen, and are we willing to stand behind it?
This is the short version. Read the full-length essay, “The Swedification of Everything”.
This issue is part of Everybody's Smart, a newsletter on taste, judgment, AI, culture, cognition, and the future of professional work. New issues every 2 to 3 weeks, free on LinkedIn.
Subscribe →